Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2025-12-06 21:59:43
Size: 1919
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2025-12-06 22:02:12
Size: 1933
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
Similarly, if any beam maps are taken: Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken:

Back to the NIKA2 main page

Daily Reports (2025/12/9-16, NIKA2 run 77, Cryo run 89)

Observers on-site:

Astronomer-of-Duty, Pool Manager:

Operators:

Preparatory notes

Please, remember to use the focus value of Ar1 (roughly Ar2 + 0.65 mm, but use directly the focus Ar1 monitor if possible).

Please fill the Table with the Ar1,2,3 focus values as follows. At best, make one table per day.

  • Focus sequences

    Scan nr

    Target

    Ar2

    Ar1

    Ar3

    Polarized?

    Notes

Similarly, if any beam maps (total power) are taken:

  • Beam maps (99 sub-scans)

    Scan Nr

    Target

    Focus

    Notes

Pool-Account usage: Accounting of observing times

  • Calibration observations like pointing, focus, and calib_1scan (the latter in case of NIKA2-Pol only, aimed at characterizing the instrumental polarization) which are conducted before and during project observations are part of the project time. Note that all proposals include such overheads in the time and sensitivity estimates. This holds for total power and polarimetry observations.

  • Other calibration observations which are important for all projects like beam maps, skydips, or calib_1scan for absolute flux calibration may be accounted under the pool account (nikaX-YY, where X = s,w and YY = year).

  • When conditions are unstable and it is unclear whether project observations make sense at all, calibrations may be accounted to the pool account.

December 9th, 2025, Tuesday

DailyReportsNika2Pool091225 (last edited 2025-12-06 22:02:12 by NikaBolometer)